DECONSTRUCTION in 10 points of the "NEW NARRATIVE" about Eastern Congo. Which is correct lays in the facts…

Publié le 19 août 2012

0


Deconstruction de la STORY sur l'Est du Congo Monusco ONU GoE

  1. NO CHARGE of war crimes against M23: "On the subject of M23, it should be clear that to date, in terms of mass killing and rape, I have not seen evidence and I don’t believe that there was a criminal responsibility [for Rwanda] or any kind of cross-border support". Stephen Rapp.
  2. NO proven EVIDENCE of Rwandan support to M23 [The GoR  refutes every points of the GoE repor].
  3. The coordinator of the UN GoE is a notorious REVISIONIST [Ibuka asked the UNSG to veto and sack him]
  4. NO  FORENSIC method was adopted by the UN experts [the poor evidences collected would be rejected by a EU or a US court].
  5. Most of the UN report is based (biaised) on oral testimonies of persons hostile to Rwanda in a region at war.
  6. Major Inconsistencies have been pointed  in the UN report such as contradictions between successive reports of the Security Council.
  7. At least one case of  FORGERY of a key evidence of the report has been uncovered [prosecution could be initiated].
  8. A senior UN official in Goma  leaked to the press confidential information without formal approval of the UN Secretary General.
  9. Before issuing  the GoE report, the UN in Goma officially admitted that there was no real evidence against Rwanda in it.
  10. U.S. NGO HRW (non grata in Rwanda)  provides International Press Agencies diverse incitements against Kigali in order to fuel THE New politically correct Narrative on Congo.

*

Copyright NanoJV

Back to the Wall

*

 "CHILD TO PARENT RELATIONSHIP MUST END! "

quote of Louise Mushikiwabo Rwanda’s Minister of  Foreign Affairs

*

*

*

*

*

About these ads